by Daniel Bloch · 09/14/11
On the eve of the Second World War, Lithuania boasted one of the most vibrant Jewish communities on the continent. Its largest city, Vilna (also known as Vilnius, Wilno and Vilne), earned the moniker “the Jerusalem of Lithuania,” and was a beacon of religious and secular learning for Yiddish-speaking Jews across Eastern Europe. Since their initial settlement during the fifteenth century, the Jews of Lithuania (commonly called Litvaks) had for centuries seen the borders change beneath their feet, and the nationality of the ruling class pitch from Lithuanian to Polish, to Russian, to Polish, to Soviet, to Lithuanian, to Nazi German, on June 24, 1941.
Much of what we know today about this once-vibrant outpost of the diaspora is thanks to the efforts of YIVO, the Institute for Jewish Research, which was founded in Vilna in 1925 as the Yiddish Scientific Institute. YIVO, which since 1940 has called New York City home and is currently housed in the Center for Jewish History on West 16th Street, is the premier resource for information on Ashkenazi history, and its archives are an overwhelming trove of over 23,000,000 items.
Now, in a macabre twist of historical irony, YIVO is currently at the center of a controversy over the place of Holocaust memory and anti-Semitism in modern-day Lithuania. On September 22, YIVO will host “The Vilna Ghetto Experience,” a concert dedicated to music composed in the Vilna ghetto, which will feature opening remarks by the Lithuanian Minister of Foreign Affairs, Audronius Ažubalis. In a letter of protest addressed to the Center for Jewish History’s Academic Council, the invitation of Mr. Ažubalis is referred to as a “harmful mistake” by Didier Bertin,President of the French-based Society for the Promotion of the European Human Rights Model. The letter equates the planned presence of the foreign minister at the YIVO event with “‘de facto’ support to the current anti-Semitic policy of the Lithuanian government by a major Jewish organization.”
A second letter of protest was sent to the CJH Academic Council in which Mr. Bertin echoes the call of a recent opinion piece in Haaretz calling for the expulsion of Lithuania’s ambassador to Israel. While the Haaretz article makes no mention of Mr. Ažubalis or the YIVO event, it aims to expose a so-called “escalation in Lithuanian chutzpah,” as illustrated by recent efforts by Lithuania’s government to investigate several Litvak survivors residing in Israel who, for example, were active in the partisan movement that fought Nazis and their Lithuanian collaborators, some of whom were later executed by the Soviets for helping the Nazis and, in turn, redefined as heroes of Lithuanian resistance against the Soviets.
Why the outcry over Mr. Ažubalis’ presence in New York? According to reports compiled by the website defendinghistory.com, a watchdog site that seeks to counter the efforts of the “Holocaust Obfuscation movement,” in October 2010 Ažubalis accused Jews of Litvak origin as being behind a bill in Lithuanian parliament that would grant dual citizenship to people with Lithuanian descent living in the diaspora.
The Forward offers a more comprehensive and objectively-reported take on the controversy. In his article, Paul Berger spoke to Jonathan Brent, YIVO’s executive director and contributor to the Moscow edition of Habitus, who said he would look into Ažubalis’ comments, but in the meantime saw the Lithuanian consulate’s co-sponsoring of “The Vilna Ghetto Experience” concert as a way of “honoring us by acknowledging the suffering of Jewish people.”